DayaniSession 2
The Unspoken Pitch

Dayani · Session 2 · The deck alone

The slides.

slides in session order. Click the green Present button on any slide to go full screen.
Arrow keys move, Escape returns. The talking points live under the Run of show tab.

One file. Scroll from the top and you are running the session.

Dayani, Session 2.

Friday 7 August, 8:00am AEST. Thursday 6 August, 3:00pm Pacific. 90 minutes.
Brian Kress, Manuel Gonzalez, Nick Ansel. Facilitated by Scott Lee.

Your one job

They react to a built recommendation and you write down their words. Nothing gets built in the room.

The one thing you must leave with

Who resources the outbound. Not whether the plan is good.

How the screen works. Slides sit inline below at the exact moment you use them, numbered automatically. Each one is a picture or a number, not a document. Every slide has a green Present button in its top right corner. Click it and that slide goes full screen. Arrow keys or the bar at the bottom move you through. Escape brings you back here. The Slides tab at the top strips this page down to the deck alone; Run of show brings the talking points back. The Unspoken Pitch sits quietly on every slide. All the detail behind the go to market slides lives in the pack document and never goes on screen.
The spine of the session is preeminence. It opens the deck, it explains why the four beats are shaped the way they are, and it closes. The argument is that Dayani stops waiting to be handed a brief and starts telling agencies what they should be exploring. Everything else today is machinery for that one idea.
Part 0

Before you start

Five minutes of setup, before you join.

Recording onYou cannot facilitate, push and capture verbatim at the same time. The whole deliverable gets written from what they say today.
Click Present on slide 1 once, now, then press EscapeThirty seconds now beats fumbling live at 8am.
Invoice drafted, not sentThe remaining $2,400. Session 2 is the milestone you agreed in December. To brian@dayani.io, not the consultqb address.
Ask if Manuel has the full 90First thing. He is your best copy source and the middle of the session needs him talking.
Recap email open in another windowYou restate the three using the wording from your email, not from the transcript.
Part 0b

Three sentences not to say

Each was in the old script. Each is wrong in a way Brian can correct you on from memory.

"In five years you haven't lost a single partner relationship."
"Twelve engagements, forty five contracts. Eight of the twelve turned into repeat work."
Why

Brian told you the spear year "cost us a partner and probably I don't know a few hundred thousand." You would be using his own word for a loss to describe an absence of loss. "Almost everyone comes back" fails too. Four of the twelve never produced a second contract.

"Verizon's disaster navigator, built with Red Cross, Habitat and United Way."
"Scoped with Red Cross, Habitat for Humanity and United Way behind it."
Why

It was scoped, then defunded before launch, and the Red Cross partnership sat inside a hypothetical Brian was describing. Say "built" and he corrects you in front of Manuel on your best proof point.

"The money is cybersecurity. RSA, Salt, Proofpoint, SCATR, Nium."
"The money is cybersecurity and enterprise tech." Or leave Nium out.
Why

Nium is payments and fintech. Their sheet has it filed under cybersecurity, which is a data entry error, not a fact. It is also the biggest contract count on your slide.

Three more, if Brian pushes on a number

Two to five weeks is typical, not universal. Proofpoint took sixteen weeks on a Matt Day intro, and Brian said entry conversations often run months.

The Verizon year by year split is his memory, not the sheet. The sheet has first contact in March 2024, under three years ago. The money is right. The span may not be.

The sheet stops at October 2025. Anything signed in 2026 is invisible to every number on these slides. That is why the open carries a caveat line.

Part 1

The session, in order

Blue bars are what you say. White boxes are what you ask. Anything behind a plus sign is reasoning, there if you want it and skippable if you do not.

0:00
Open5 minutes. Title slide up while you talk, then the three back on the table.
Slide 1
Say

"Different shape today. Last time I asked and you two talked. Today I brought. I've built a recommendation off everything you said, and it's one view, not a menu, because a menu lets you blend three things into something mealy mouthed and that's the thing you hired me to fix.

Your job today is to hit it. Tell me where it's wrong.

One caveat. Everything numerical comes off the sheet you sent, which runs to about October last year. If something's landed since, tell me and I'll fold it in."

Say  read this one, don't paraphrase it

"Before I go in, let me put the three back on the table exactly as I sent them.

One. Community centered design and innovation. That's the lens on everything, from Verizon through to Solidigm.

Two. Impact that's actionable. Someone brings you in and the thing gets done. Real outcomes, not decks.

Three. Experimentation as how you work rather than as a headline. It's baked into the process and it's part of why working with you isn't cookie cutter, but it sits under the first two rather than beside them.

And emerging tech and AI stay in the mix as proof you can master new tools and put them to work, not as a service line of their own."

Ask
  1. Still the three?
If Brian reopens it here, do not fight it and do not spend more than two minutes. "Noted, park it, and if it's still bothering you at the end we'll deal with it." Write down who reopened it and why. If it's still live at the close, that is your finding.
Why the wording matters

Manuel took experimentation off in the room and Brian resisted. Your email split the difference by demoting rather than deleting, which was right. Do not describe it as "we dropped experimentation," because he will hear a decision he did not make.

Brian named experimentation second of his own three, not third. Say "sits under." Never say "moved down."

Messaging and GTM

Session two of two, and the recommendation.

Prepared for Brian Kress and Manuel Gonzalez
August 2026

Prepared and facilitated byThe Unspoken Pitch
0:05
Block 1. The recommendation17 minutes. Where you are, the idea underneath it, then what you say.
On screen
The shape of this block, so you can say it out loud at the top. Where you are. The idea underneath everything, which is preeminence. What holds it together. What never leads, so the noise is off the table. The three principles you operate from. Then the formula for putting all of it into a conversation.
Where you are  60 seconds

"Before the recommendation, one thing the sheet says that nobody said out loud last time. You have a very good business with a bad pipeline. Those are different problems.

Warm intro to signed is typically two to five weeks. Peet's was four days. Verizon started at around twenty thousand and Brian, by your own account, ran to roughly three seventy. Eight of the twelve engagements turned into repeat work.

Nobody gets that by accident. So none of what follows is about fixing the work. It's about the fact that almost all of it arrived through the same three doors."

Why sixty seconds of praise first

Session 1 was a confrontation and Brian sat through most of it being told his numbers were not what he thought. Open on another diagnosis and he goes quiet, and a quiet Brian gives you nothing to write with. This buys the two uncomfortable moments later.

Dayani  /  Where you are

A very good business with a bad pipeline.

2 to 5 wksTypical close on a warm intro
$20K to $370KVerizon, five contracts
11 · 9 · 5 · 5Contracts at Nium, Solidigm, Proofpoint, Verizon
8 of 12Engagements that came back for more
Preeminence  the idea everything else hangs off

"Before I show you a single word of messaging, here's the idea underneath all of it, because if you don't buy this the rest won't matter.

Jay Abraham calls it the strategy of preeminence. The short version is you stop seeing yourself as a vendor pushing a service and start seeing yourself as the most trusted advisor your client has. You care more about their outcome than about the next project. And crucially, you lead. You tell them what they should be doing, not just what they asked you to price.

Here's why it matters for you specifically. Right now you wait to be handed a brief. Matt has a project, he calls you, you build it. That's a vendor relationship, and it's why you've got a very good business with a bad pipeline.

The version I want for you is the one where you walk into Matt's world and say, here's what your telco client should be doing with AI next year and they don't know it yet. You're the ones who know what's possible. They don't. So the whole game is stopping waiting to be asked.

Everything after this slide is just machinery for that."

Why this is the spine, and one honesty note

This reframes the whole engagement. Without it, the four beats read as sales technique and Manuel will resist them. With it, the beats read as how a trusted advisor opens a conversation, which is a very different thing to agree to. It also does the work of making the free scoping offer make sense, because giving before you ask is preeminence in practice.

Honesty note on the attribution. The strategy of preeminence is genuinely Jay Abraham's, and the core idea is exactly as described: move from vendor to trusted advisor, lead with the client's outcome, become the default choice. I have not verified a word for word quote, so do not put one in quotation marks and attribute it to him. Describe the idea and name him as its source, which is accurate and enough.

The idea underneath all of this

Stop waiting to be handed a brief.

A vendor

  • Waits for the brief
  • Answers what was asked
  • Gets compared on price
  • Is called when there's a project

The preeminent advisor

  • Writes the brief
  • Raises what nobody asked
  • Is the only real option
  • Is called before there's a project

Jay Abraham's strategy of preeminence. You stop being a supplier and become the advisor your client cannot afford not to talk to. For Dayani that means telling agencies what their clients should be exploring, because you know what is possible and they do not.

Then one aimed at Manuel  no slide

"Manuel, one thing aimed at you specifically, because I think you'll be sitting there wondering it.

Most of today is about agencies, and that could sound like I'm telling you to become a better subcontractor. I'm not. It's the opposite. Preeminence is the argument against being a subcontractor.

And the Verizon work, the one piece of this business that matches what you said you want to be known for, came through an agency. qb. Sam Hartsock. So agencies aren't the alternative to the mission work. Right now they're the only route to it that's ever worked. What changes is which agencies, and what you are to them."

Why this can't wait

Manuel's line was that he wants to work with businesses impacting humanity, not stripping it. Ninety minutes about selling to brand shops reads as the opposite unless you name it. Preeminence gives you a much stronger version of this answer than you had before, because it recasts the agency relationship as leadership rather than supply.

The umbrella

"Here's what holds it together, and it's your two sentences, not mine.

Dayani helps big companies show up for the communities they're already in. And then actually gets it built.

First half is Brian's. Second half is Manuel's, and his version was blunter than mine. Community centered on the front, actionable on the back."

The umbrella

Dayani helps big companies show up for the communities they're already in.
Then actually gets it built.

What never leads  clear the deck before you build on it

"Before I show you what you do lead with, here's what you don't, and I want it out of the way first, because these four are what you instinctively reach for.

AI. Climate. Venture. Experimentation.

All four are true. Not one of them opens a door. Nobody has ever hired you because you said the word AI, and three of them make you sound like someone selling a category rather than someone solving a problem.

They're not gone. They're implied, they show up in the work, and they're the reason someone believes you once they're already interested. They just never go first."

Why this is early

It clears the four things they reach for instinctively so everything after has room, and it is the easiest thing in the session to agree with, which gets a yes on the board before anything harder.

Brian and Manuel already killed venture themselves in Session 1, Manuel because "I don't want people asking me for money I don't have" and Brian because "it implies we're the funders and we're not." So this should land clean. If it does not, that is your first finding of the day.

What never goes first, either audience

AIClimateVentureExperimentation
The three principles  what you operate from

"So what does go first. These three. They're not lines you say, they're what has to be true underneath everything you say, and they're what earns you the right to lead a conversation rather than take a brief. All three are your words from last session, not mine.

One. Senior only. Director level, working inside the client's team rather than replacing it. No juniors stacked on an execution project. That's why your first round is most agencies' third or fourth round of work, and that's not my line either, Brian, it's a compliment somebody paid you.

Two. Visionary realists. Wacky concepts, delivered with integrity, and you don't pitch what can't exist. Verizon's disaster navigator, scoped with Red Cross, Habitat and United Way, is the proof.

Three. Weird expertise. Brian, your phrase. Four or five years on the Chico Climate Action Commission writing local policy. No agency in this category can say that, and for a telco trying to work inside a community it's the whole difference."

On the first round line, correct yourself out loud. Brian's exact words: "one of the better compliments we've gotten is that when we show up into a room, our first round is most agencies' third or fourth round of work. We're not necessarily fast. We just are out of the gate more experienced and have a higher threshold."

It's a claim about quality, not about being brought into a pitch early. And it's a compliment he was paid, not a line he uses. He never says who said it. Ask him who.

What you operate from, and get known for

Senior only. Inside your team, not replacing it.No juniors on an execution project. It is why your first round is most agencies' third or fourth round of work.
Visionary realists. We don't pitch what can't exist.Wacky concepts, delivered with integrity. Verizon's disaster navigator, scoped with Red Cross, Habitat for Humanity and United Way.
Weird expertise no agency here can claim.Five years writing and leading local climate policy on the Chico Climate Action Commission.
Say before the beats  the crosswalk. Do not skip it.

"One thing before the last two slides. The proposal said a messaging framework for each service line, agency, climate and AI. Those lines don't exist anymore, you collapsed them last session. So I've cut it a different way, and nothing's been dropped, it's moved.

The agency line became the partner facing message set. The climate line became the end client message set. AI stopped being a line because you demoted it yourselves. Same scope, better cut.

Because here's the thing nobody said out loud last time. An agency principal does not buy community centered design. He buys keeping his client and not having to hire a digital team. Two different conversations, and you've only ever had one of them written down."

Why this sentence is load bearing

Manuel reviewed the proposal and will notice if three lines become two audiences without an explanation. Say it out loud here, and put the same crosswalk in the written pack, or the delivered document reads as under delivery against the invoice.

The four beats  the formula

"So that's what you operate from. This is how you use it, and it's not a message hierarchy. Nobody talks in hierarchies. It's four beats of a conversation you're both already having, and the only thing that changes between an agency and a client is what goes in each beat.

Beat one, they ask what you do. You put yourself in a box they already understand. Boring, five seconds.

Beat two, they ask for an example. One story, not a credentials list.

Beat three, and only if they're still in it, they work out why you. That's where the principles come out. Not first.

Beat four, one small ask that costs them nothing. And this is where preeminence shows up, because the ask is you giving them something, not you asking for work."

How you use it in a conversation

Four beats. Not a hierarchy.

Beat 1"So what do you do?"Put yourself in a box they already understand.
Beat 2"Like what?"One story. Not a list of credentials.
Beat 3"Why you though?"The principles. Here, and never earlier.
Beat 4"So what now?"You give them something. Never an ask.
The same four beats, filled in  the words come from you, not the screen

Left column is the reminder of what each beat is for. Walk the agency column first. Read these loose, the way you would actually say them.

"Beat one, agency side. 'We're typically the digital arm for agencies whose clients want products built. You win the work, we become that division for you.' Digital arm is the phrase. He can picture it instantly, it says division rather than competitor, and it's the reason white label works later.

Beat two. 'Verizon's the one people know. Came through another shop that had won the brand work. Started small, about a twenty thousand dollar project, and we helped them win it. Turned into five contracts.' The scale, the fact you came through a partner, and that you helped them win rather than just delivering after.

Beat three. This one is conversational, it's not a claim. 'Honestly we started doing this because we kept seeing agencies with brilliant brand teams and no proper tech people behind them. That's the gap we fill. Everyone our side is director level, which is why clients tell us our first round is where most agencies get to on their third.' The origin story does the work and the compliment lands at the end as evidence.

Beat four, and this is the preeminence one. 'If you've got a pitch coming up and you need help on the digital side, let me know. Or if your clients keep asking about AI and product and you're not sure what to tell them, happy to sit down and work out what's actually right for them. We white label for most of the agencies we work with, so you stay the one in front of the client.' Two doors, and white label is the sentence that kills the take-my-client fear."

Then the client column.

"Beat one. 'We help big companies build the digital products they know they need and don't know how to build. That's the bit we're good at.'

Beat two. Verizon from the community end. 'When a disaster hits, the people with the least take longest to recover, mostly because they don't know what help exists. We spent time in those communities, worked out what they actually needed, then designed the thing to do it.'

Beat three. Brian, this is yours to tell. 'Four or five years on a climate commission writing local policy, so when we walk into a utility we already know how this gets approved and who signs it.' Then land it: that's usually the difference between a plan and a thing that ships.

Beat four. 'Have you got something you've wanted to do for a while and haven't been able to get moving? That's usually the conversation worth having.'"

Then, if you want one line to carry the whole thing.

"If you only get one sentence. Agency: we're the digital arm for agencies whose clients want products built. Client: we build the digital products big companies don't know how to build."

Notice where AI turns up. The never-leads slide says it doesn't go first, and it doesn't. It appears at beat four, agency side, as something their client is asking about and they cannot answer. That is the only place it belongs, and it is preeminence in one sentence. It is a reason to call you, not a thing you sell.
Why a hierarchy was never going to work here

Manuel said "we're anti marketers," and when asked to rank the three in Session 1 he said "shit, you're asking us to do marketing now, isn't that your job?" A ranked message list was never going to survive him. A conversation he already has will.

Keep beat three and beat four separate in your own head. Beat three is the standard of the work. Beat four is the door opener. If they fuse, "our first round is most agencies' third or fourth" starts sounding like "we turn up earlier," which is not what Brian meant.

Then, while that slide is still up  2 minutes
Ask
  1. Everything I've just shown you is somebody else's client. Which of these can you name publicly on a website: Verizon, Nium, Proofpoint, RSA, Solidigm, Salt?
  2. Can we reference Fred and Ted at all, and would you want to ask Matt before we do?Fred and Ted is Matt Day's shop. Seven of your twelve engagements.
Why this sits here and not at the end

Everything they have just looked at runs on these names, and they will never be more focused on them than right now. If the answer is no, the numbers get anonymised and the argument still works, but you need to know before you write it. Finding out after delivery burns one of your two revision rounds on something that is not a client edit.

Now press Escape and stop sharing. If a slide stays up they read instead of talk, and everything after this depends on them talking.

Same four beats. Two very different conversations.

The beatTo an agency principalTo an end client
1. Place yourselfThey ask what you do. Boring, five seconds. "We're typically the digital arm for agencies whose clients want products built. You win the work, we become that division for you." "We help big companies build the digital products they know they need and don't know how to build. That's the bit we're good at."
2. One storyThey ask like what. Never a credentials list. "Verizon's the one people know. Came through another shop that had won the brand work. Started small, about a twenty thousand dollar project, and we helped them win it. Turned into five contracts." "Verizon. When a disaster hits, the people with the least take longest to recover, mostly because they don't know what help exists. We spent time in those communities, worked out what they actually needed, then designed the thing to do it."
3. Why youOnly if they're still in it. The principles land here. "Honestly we started doing this because we kept seeing agencies with brilliant brand teams and no proper tech people behind them. That's the gap we fill. Everyone our side is director level, which is why clients tell us our first round is where most agencies get to on their third." "Brian's spent four or five years on a climate commission writing local policy, so when we walk into a utility we already know how this gets approved and who signs it. That's usually the difference between a plan and a thing that ships."
4. You giveCosts them nothing. Never a proposal. "If you've got a pitch coming up and you need help on the digital side, let me know. Or if your clients keep asking about AI and product and you're not sure what to tell them, happy to sit down and work out what's actually right for them. We white label for most of the agencies we work with, so you stay the one in front of the client." "Have you got something you've wanted to do for a while and haven't been able to get moving? That's usually the conversation worth having."
0:22
Block 2. They hit it23 minutes. Conversation only. Shut up and write down their phrasing.
No screen
Ask
  1. What's wrong with it?
  2. Where does it sound like you, and where does it sound like me?
  3. Which line of that would you actually say out loud on a call? Which one would you never say?This is the one that decides things. If they wouldn't say it out loud it's dead, no matter how good it looks.
  4. Manuel, does it survive your test? Would you want to work with someone who came to you off the back of that?
  5. Brian, does it stop you being embarrassed?
Listen for their words replacing yours. Every time one of them rephrases something better than you wrote it, capture the exact phrasing. That is the deliverable writing itself.
Two things to watch for

Manuel punches at anything that sounds like a marketer wrote it. If he does, that's useful. Ask for his version rather than defending yours.

One join he might catch. "We help big companies show up for the people they serve, and then we build the thing" is two people's words stitched. Brian said the first half, Manuel the second, in different parts of the session. If he calls it, agree instantly and ask him to say the whole thing in one breath.

0:45
Block 3. Their words, cold10 minutes. A drill, from scratch. Never cut this block.
No screen
Say  frame it as a drill, or they'll just recite you back

"Different thing now, and I want to be clear about what it is before we start.

This isn't a test, and it isn't you repeating what I just said. It's a drill, and it's from scratch. Everything up to now has been you reacting to my words. This is your words, cold, and if you hand me back my sentence I'll know you're being polite.

So don't look at anything. I'm going to play the agency guy, and you just answer me like you would in the room. I want whatever actually comes out of your mouth, including the bad version. The bad version is the useful one."

How this actually runs, so you're not improvising it. You are playing a character and interviewing them. Four lines, in this order, said out loud exactly like this:

You: "So what do you do?" Then stop. Let them answer. Do not help.
You: "Like what?" Then stop. You want a story, not a list.
You: "Why you though?" Then stop. This is where the principles should come out, unprompted.
You: "Alright. Now do it again, but I'm the person at Verizon." Same three questions, client side.

That is the whole block. Roughly ninety seconds each way, then play it back to them and ask what they heard. You are not coaching. You are harvesting language so the pack gets written out of their mouths instead of yours.
The five you actually say
Ask
  1. "So what do you do?"Beat one. You're at a bar. He does brand well, can't do digital, holds a telco account.
  2. "Like what?"Beat two. Make him tell you a story.
  3. "Why you though?"Beat three. Brian, if the answer is the first round line, say the whole thing, including who said it to you.
  4. Now all three again from the client side. Someone at Verizon asks what you do.
  5. Last one. What's the single line for a first email, where you don't get four beats, you get one sentence?
Why it's a drill and not a discussion

You will get better language in ninety seconds of role play than in ten minutes of asking them to articulate a message, and it sidesteps Manuel's objection entirely, because nobody experiences answering a question as marketing.

The agency version goes first deliberately. It's the conversation they've never rehearsed. Run the client version first and they warm up on the easy one then borrow its shape. Expect the first answer to come out badly. Let it. Sit in the silence, then ask again.

Q9 is the single most valuable thing you can leave the room with. Nothing in the written pack can be finished without it.

0:55
Block 4. Go to market17 minutes. Pictures, then talk. Escape out before the questions.
On screen
The finding

"One thing came out of the sheet that changes how I'd go at this, and I want to say it before I show you the plan.

Roughly ninety five cents in every dollar you've earned came from someone one of you had already worked with. Matt Day. Mike at Solidigm, a former colleague. Amanda, who was a partner here.

The other five cents is three small ones. Exergy came off a conference and took thirteen weeks. Onora came out of the Work on Climate Slack. Stow came through a friend of Amanda's. All three matter, but none of them is a channel you can turn up.

So the way you find four more Matt Days isn't networking. It's a list built out of your own two work histories. That list already exists, nobody's ever written it down."

Five years of revenue, one finding

95¢

in every dollar came from someone you had already worked with.

The three lanes

"Three lanes, and the sizes tell you the whole story.

Hold is where ninety five per cent of the money is. Three relationships, none of them written down anywhere. The job is making sure the revenue survives any one of those people changing jobs.

Warm is the mission channel. Five per cent. Slow, won't fund you, but it's where the work you want to be known for comes from, so it stays.

Add is zero today. That's the whole job this year."

What actually happens in each lane

"And here's what each one actually means in practice, so it's not three words on a chart.

Hold. Three relationships on a real rhythm, quarterly, in the calendar. A rate card so you're easy to buy. Meghan owned separately from Matt, because right now that's one relationship wearing two names.

Add. Twenty five names off your own two work histories. Both filters applied. Three personal notes a week, and two live partnerships by the end of the year.

Warm. Half an hour a week in the climate channels that already produced Onora and Stow. Amanda asked one specific question instead of a catch-up. And the website, which is the cheapest conversion work you've got and it's already paid for.

Every name, owner, cadence and ninety day marker behind this is in the pack I'll send you. I'm not going to read a table at you."

Where the money comes from, and where the work is

Hold~95%Make the three you have permanent
Warm~5%The mission channel. Slow, but it's the work you want
Add0%Two more partnerships. This is the whole job

What each lane actually means

Hold
Nine of twelve engagements
  • Matt, Meghan, Greg and qb on a real rhythm. Quarterly, in the calendar, not when you need something.
  • Meghan owned separately from Matt. Right now that's one relationship wearing two names.
  • A rate card and a one page sheet a principal can forward without editing it.
  • Decide whether qb is still a partner or a past client.
Add
Zero today. The whole job.
  • Twenty five names off your own two work histories, both filters applied.
  • Three personal notes a week from Brian or Manuel. Never a template.
  • Connect and nurture the same names on LinkedIn so you stay in view between conversations.
  • Two live partnerships by the end of the year.
Warm
Small, slow, and the work you want
  • Half an hour a week in the climate channels that already produced Onora and Stow.
  • Amanda, asked one specific question instead of a catch-up.
  • Track past champions. When they move, that's a company that already trusts you.
  • The website. Cheapest conversion work you have and it's already paid for.
The door opener principle

"This is preeminence made concrete, and it's the only thing in this plan that gives before it asks.

A brand shop doesn't lose the digital work because it forgot about you. It loses it earlier, in the pitch, when it can't scope or estimate it. So it prices it wrong, leaves it out, or loses the account to someone who could answer the question. That moment is weeks before anyone talks to a subcontractor, and it's the moment you're useful.

So the offer is: we'll scope and estimate your next pitch. Two hours, free, whether you win or not. You keep the client. We never appear in front of them unless you put us there.

Greg has already been circling this. He's talked about co-pitching and building joint capability. This is the smallest version of that, the one he can say yes to without a conversation about structure."

Preeminence, made concrete

Give before you ask.

"We'll scope and estimate your next pitch. Two hours, free, whether you win or not."

Who you're going after  the uncomfortable one

"Now who. Two filters, and you need both.

Filter one. Great at brand, weak on digital and product. That's the gap you fill.

Filter two, and this is the one that matters. Who does that agency serve. Telco, utilities, insurance, banks, health systems, corporate responsibility arms.

Here's why both. Fred and Ted passes filter one perfectly. Great at brand, can't do digital. But its clients are cybersecurity companies, so what you build is cybersecurity websites. That pays, and I'm not knocking it, it's most of your revenue.

So if you only apply filter one, you get two more agencies exactly like Fred and Ted. More revenue, same work. In twelve months you'd be busier and no closer to another Verizon. Filter two is the one that changes what kind of work arrives, because qb passed both, and qb is where Verizon came from."

The line you didn't understand, and why I rewrote it

The old wording was "drop the second circle and in twelve months you have five more Fred and Teds, and you're exactly as far from the Verizon work as you are today." Too compressed, and it read as a criticism of Fred and Ted, which is not the point.

Fred and Ted is a perfectly good partner who happens to serve cybersecurity clients. Clone that shape and you clone the client base with it. Filter two is not about finding better agencies, it is about finding agencies whose clients are the kind of companies Brian said he wants to work for. It is the only mechanism in the plan that connects the revenue work to the mission work.

Two filters. You need both.

Great at
brand.
Weak on
digital.
Serves telco,
utilities,
insurance,
banks, health.
Your
two

Filter one alone gets you more of what you already have. Fred and Ted is great at brand and can't do digital, and its clients are cybersecurity firms, so what you build is cybersecurity websites. Two more agencies like that means more revenue and no more Verizons. qb passed both filters, and qb is where Verizon came from.

How you reach them  the menu, so they can see what was considered

"So that's who. Here's every way of actually getting in front of them, and every one of these is judged against your numbers, not against what usually works for people.

Top two are proven in your own sheet. People you've already worked with, and introductions from the partners you already have.

Third is LinkedIn, and I think this is the one you're missing. Every one of those twenty five names is already on there. Connect with all of them, keep a simple list of who they are and what they run, then every few weeks one of them gets something specific. Here's what we built inside another agency's account and here's what it did. So when a client finally asks them for something digital, you're the name already in their head. That's a nurture sequence, not a newsletter.

Fourth. Planting a seed. Give them something before you need anything, and the easiest version is the brand and identity work you get asked for and turn down. Send it to a shop you want a relationship with. That's preeminence again, and it's the fastest way to build credit with a firm you've never worked with.

Fifth. The partner directories on whatever platforms you build on. Agencies are looking for build partners there. Costs an afternoon.

Sixth. Agency owner communities and conferences. Real, but they cost money and days.

Last one, cold email. That's a cold start with someone who's never met you, and it's produced one engagement for you in five years. I'd test it, not build on it.

I'm recommending the top four."

The LinkedIn row is the one worth slowing down on. It answers the objection that this plan is one channel wearing a hat, and it is the only route that keeps working while they are busy. Three pieces, in order. Connect with all twenty five. Keep them in one list with a note on what each of them runs. Then send one useful, specific thing every few weeks.

Say what it is not, before Manuel does. Not a newsletter, not a posting schedule, not thought leadership. Twenty five named people, not an audience.

Two things he could throw at you here. He cut CRM and email work in the sales calls, in his words "we don't do a lot of CRM related stuff, we do a lot of word of mouth." And a LinkedIn content calendar was a line item in your original seven and fifteen thousand dollar options that got deleted when the proposal was revised. The line that holds: "This isn't the content calendar we took out. That was posting to an audience. This is a channel recommendation inside the go to market plan, it's twenty five people you've chosen, and you send the thing, not me."
Do not offer to build it for them here. This is exactly what sits behind "someone outside does it" at the close, and offering it in Block 4 turns a delivery session into a pitch an hour early. If they ask directly: "Yes, that's a conversation for the follow-up call."
Why this slide exists, and one uncertainty flag

You flagged that the plan felt thin on ways to reach agency owners and you were right. What was there was one route dressed as a plan. Showing seven with a recommendation turns the block from a presentation into a decision they make.

Uncertainty. I have not verified what Dayani actually builds on, so which partner directory is worth an afternoon depends on their stack. Ask rather than assert. That is also why the platform question is in Block 5.

Every route in, judged against your own numbers

The routeWhat your own record saysVerdict
People you've already worked withRoughly every dollar of your revenue, five years runningDo this
Introductions from Matt, Greg, AmandaHow Verizon and the Stow lead both arrivedDo this
LinkedIn, connect then nurtureEvery name on your list is already reachable thereBuild it
Planting a seedGive them something before you need anythingWorth trying
Partner directories on the platforms you build onAgencies are looking for build partnersOne test
Agency owner communities and conferencesCosts money and daysOnly with a name
Cold emailA cold start with someone who has never met youTest
How you keep a partnership alive

"One more on this, because getting a partnership isn't the hard part. Keeping one is.

Right now you talk to Matt when there's a project. That's the vendor pattern again. Here's the advisor version, and it's four things.

One. Show up on a rhythm, not when you need something. Quarterly, in the calendar, booked before you hang up.

Two. Ask what you could have done better. Then actually fix it. Nobody asks him that, and it's the fastest way to find the next piece of work.

Three. Bring two ideas for his clients that he hasn't thought of. Every single time. That's the preeminence move, and it's the difference between someone he calls and someone he thinks with.

Four. Follow the people who've referred you. Sam Hartsock already moved and nobody went with him. When someone moves, that's a new company that already trusts you, and right now nobody is watching for it.

Same four for Meghan, separately, because she sources different work."

Where this came from

This is the Hold lane turned into behaviour. Without it, "quarterly cadence" is a word on a chart that nobody does. With it, they have four things to say in a call, which is the actual barrier.

It is also the strongest place in the deck for preeminence, because "bring two ideas he hasn't thought of" is the whole philosophy in one instruction, and it costs nothing.

Getting a partnership isn't the hard part

01Show up on a rhythm, not when you need something.Quarterly, in the calendar, booked before you hang up.
02Ask what you could have done better. Then fix it.Nobody asks him that. It is the fastest route to the next piece of work.
03Bring two ideas for his clients he hasn't thought of.Every time. This is the difference between someone he calls and someone he thinks with.
04Follow the people who referred you. Watch where they go.When someone moves, that's a new company that already trusts you.
Twelve months

"If this works, here's a year from now. Five agency relationships that produce work, up from three. That's Brian's own number, not a stretch target.

And it's sized deliberately. An hour a week each. If it needed more than that it wouldn't happen, because Brian's fully billable and Manuel's half."

Twelve months from now

35

agency relationships that produce work. Brian's own number.

2Partner pitches scoped free. At least one won.
<40%Revenue behind any one relationship. Today it's about half.
1 hrPer founder, per week. More than that and it doesn't happen.
The blank column

"Last one on this, and it's the shortest. There are three jobs in this plan I've deliberately left blank.

Building the list. Twenty five names off your own two work histories, each one with a reason it's on there. Two weeks of work, once.

Tracking who's moved where. Every past client contact who changes jobs is a new company that already trusts you. Nobody's watching this, so those doors close quietly.

And deciding which rooms are worth showing up to. That only gets answered after Matt tells you which rooms produce work for him.

I'm not going to tell you who does those three, because that's your call and it's the last question I'll ask you today."

Why say this at all, when the plan is to not name Nick

Nick is on the call looking at three blank rows that describe his function. Say nothing and he feels handled. This is honest, it defuses the room, and it still leaves the question open. It also sets the close up instead of ambushing them with it.

Press Escape here. The rest of this block is conversation.
Ask  no screen. Live questions, answered now, out loud.
Ask
  1. Who are the four? Not firms. Names of people you've worked with who now sit in a shop like that.You want actual human names, said out loud, written down. Not a promise to think about it. If they can't get to four, that is the finding, and it is more useful than four soft names.
  2. What does Matt need from you that he isn't getting?
  3. Amanda gave you Verizon and the Stow lead. What's the one specific ask you'd make of her?
  4. Greg and the Go Happy thing. Is that repairable, and do you want it repaired?
  5. Manuel, your network runs through Dentsu. Where's the line on using it?Short question. Don't let it become a debate.
  6. In person or Zoom. What actually closes in your world?
Two corrections from the old version, so you don't repeat them.
Greg did not ask for free scoping. What Brian said is you've had lots of conversations about him being a hunter for you, co-pitching, and building joint capability.

Mike Gaertner has not moved on. He's the sitting champion inside Solidigm who spent a long time finding a reason to bring you in. Sam Hartsock is the one who moved.
Four things to have ready in case Brian pushes

The net and the spear. "Five partnerships is the net. Each one is a net somebody else is already paying to maintain. What I've cut is the nets you'd have to build yourself, and every one of those has a twelve month payback you can't fund out of an hour a week."

Can we service what we win. "This is sized deliberately. Five partnerships, not fifty leads. If it worked any harder you couldn't staff it, and you've told me that twice."

The bandwidth maths. Twenty five names, about half worth a conversation, about half of those worth a coffee. Fifteen to eighteen coffees in a year.

If they say Nick's name first, don't deflect. "Good. Then three questions. How many hours a week. Until when. And is he building the list or owning the outcome, because those are different jobs."

Three jobs I've left blank on purpose

Build the list.Twenty five names off your own two work histories, each with a reason. Two weeks, once.?
Track who's moved where.Every past contact who changes jobs is a company that already trusts you. Nobody is watching.?
Decide which rooms are worth it.Only answerable after Matt says which rooms produce work.?
1:12
Block 5. The website12 minutes. One slide, then lock the list. Copy goes by email.
On screen
Say this first, then show it

"Last thing, and it's short, because I don't think we should spend the end of this session reading copy.

Manuel, you said the website's the calling card and the page set would change depending on what we landed on. We've landed on it. So here's the thinking, and the actual words come to you by email so you've both got time to sit with them properly rather than reacting live.

Five pages, one job each. And one is directly part of the go to market plan, which is why it's in this session. The partners page is the link that goes in every first contact. Right now if you send someone to your site, Manuel's own words are they'd probably get confused."

Ask
Ask
  1. Is that the page set? Five, or is there a sixth?Lock a number, not just a list. Your close commits you to writing whatever gets locked.
  2. Anything on there doing the wrong job?
  3. Who's actually building it, and on what platform?Changes how the copy gets handed over, and it is the answer to the partner directory question too.
Say out loud that partners and work are additions. The original scope named homepage, about and services, and all three are still there. Framing the other two as additions lands as generosity instead of something you always owed.
Why this stays in, when you asked whether to cut it for revenue work

One of the five pages is revenue work. The partners page is the asset the entire Add lane depends on, because it is what a principal reads before deciding whether the coffee is worth it. Cutting the website would leave the plan with a hole.

The other reason is commercial. Website messaging is not in the proposal Manuel read. It is in scope because you added it verbally on 18 December to close him. Your words were "copy ready." He said "I'm thinking that for now" and signed. It is the largest thing still owing and he is the one most likely to check.

The website. Five pages, one job each.

HomepageThe end client story. Someone lands here and understands within one screen what you build and who for.
PartnersThe agency story. The link that goes in every first contact email. Part of the go to market plan, not a nice to have.
AboutSenior only, and the weird expertise. Where the reason to trust you lives.
ServicesHow the work gets done. One page, not three offers called agency, climate and AI.
WorkThe proof. Emerging tech and AI live inside these case studies, and nowhere else.
1:24
Close6 minutes. Never cut this. Final slide up while you say the last thing.
Final slide
Say

"Here's what I heard change today. Restate their edits, using their words back at them.

I'll rework it and have the full pack with you in three weeks. Messaging for both audiences with the crosswalk back to the three service lines, positioning, the go to market plan with all the detail behind those slides, website messaging for the five pages we just locked, and the partner conversation language. Two rounds of revisions on the messaging and two on the plan, counted from that delivery.

And the follow-up call. Two weeks after delivery, so Friday 11 September. Thirty minutes. Let's put it in now.

Two housekeeping things. Everything stays in one email thread. And to keep it simple, who's the one person I send to?"

Three weeks, not two

The contract says three to four and there's website copy to write from zero. Two weeks is you volunteering to be late on an engagement already about seven months behind. Deliver on time and let that be the apology.

Ask
Ask
  1. What's the one thing you'd change before I write this up?You want one of two answers. Either a single concrete edit you can make in the write-up, or nothing. Both are clean. What you are avoiding is "anything still not sitting right", which reopens the whole session at minute 88.
  2. Last one, and it's the important one. Who's driving this once I hand it over?
Say  only after they answer Q24, and only once

"Right. Whatever the answer is, the honest version is this. There are three ways this gets resourced. Someone inside does it. Someone outside does it. Or nobody does it, and it stays a document. If it turns out to be the second one, that's a conversation, and the follow-up call is the right time to have it. I'm not pitching you today."

Then stop talking.

Yes, it's the retainer. One sentence is the whole play.

"Someone outside does it" is you, and everyone in the room knows it. Naming it as one of three options rather than pitching it is what makes it land as honesty. No follow-up, no elaboration.

It's a callback, not a cold open. Brian pre-sold it himself on the first call: "it is probably more advisory and a more continuous kind of engagement. My sense is that neither of us will actually use it all that well, at least right out of the gate. And so having some amount of extra hands to help fill that pipeline would be interesting."

Put the last slide up and say this  the note they leave on

"One last thing, and then I'll let you go.

Everything we've done today only works if you decide to lead. Preeminence isn't a positioning statement, it's a choice you make in every conversation. Do I wait to be asked, or do I tell them what they should be doing.

Right now your agencies do not know what's possible with AI and product. You do. That gap is the widest it has ever been, and it will not stay open. So don't wait for them to send you a brief. Tell them what they should be building."

Then stop. Do not add anything after this.

Why end here rather than on logistics

The resourcing sentence is a business moment and it needs to sit in silence for a beat. Then you give them something to walk out with that is not about you. It also closes the loop opened on the preeminence slide, which is what makes the session feel like one argument instead of six blocks.

Do not mention the retainer again here. If the last thing they hear is a philosophy, it lands. If it is a sales line, everything before it gets re-read as setup.

One last thing

Don't wait to be handed a brief.

Your agencies do not know what is possible with AI and product right now. You do. That gap is the widest it has ever been and it will not stay open.

Tell them what they should be building.

Part 2

Within the hour after you hang up

Goodwill is highest right now and it decays fast. All of this goes in one email.

Recap email, same threadTheir edits in their words, the locked page list and the number, the naming permissions, the booked follow-up date, and the resourcing question restated as an open item. Say the full pack lands in three weeks so nobody is waiting on it.
Put the AI demotion in writingBrian called the venture and product work "core to our story" on the Nick call and nothing written has recorded the demotion. If it isn't in a thread it isn't agreed.
Invoice $2,400, same emailFramed as the milestone, to brian@dayani.io, on terms.
State the revision countTwo rounds on messaging, two on the plan, counted from delivery. Say it or it becomes unlimited.
Diarise a day 7 chaseThe deposit went out 19 December and cleared around 1 January after two chases. Assume 30 days and two chases.
Otter share linkPull it from the workspace, not the notification email, because those carry personal tracking redirects.
If you're running behind

What you cannot leave without

1. Their words for beat one, agency sideBlock 3, Q9. Nothing else in the pack can be written without it.
2. Naming permissionsBlock 1, Q2 and Q3. It blocks the writing.
3. Four names, or an honest admission there aren't fourBlock 4, Q14.
4. The locked page list and the numberBlock 5, Q20. It's the thing Manuel bought.
5. The ownership answerClose, Q24. Either a name or an opening.
Cut in this order: Block 4 Q16 and Q17, then Block 2 down to Q4, Q6 and Q8, then Block 5 down to your recommendation with a yes or no. Never cut Block 3, the naming permissions, or the close.
What happens to the pack document. dayani-gtm-detail.md is the report that goes out with the full delivery in three weeks, not today. It holds everything behind the go to market slides: the three lane tables with owners, cadence and 90 day markers, the two Matt Day call scripts, the wedge numbers and the stop list. dayani-website-messaging-draft.md holds draft copy for the five pages and goes in the same delivery. Mention both in the recap email so they know detail is coming and don't ask for it on Monday.